• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • 2-DERGİLER
    • 03) Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi
    • Cilt 14, Sayı 3 (2025)
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • 2-DERGİLER
    • 03) Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi
    • Cilt 14, Sayı 3 (2025)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    GDD Generation for Hyper-Casual Games Using Large Language Models: A Comparative Evaluation

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Tam Metin/Full Text (681.0Kb)
    Date
    2025-09-30
    Author
    Bal, Abdullah
    Doğan, Buket
    Aydinalp, Muhammet Emin
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Game Design Documentation (GDD) is a critical document that includes the design and mechanical details of the game to be developed. These documents create a common understanding among team members by including details such as the game's progress, story, and design features. In order for the game development process to proceed and be completed healthily, these documents must be prepared in a high-quality, clear, and detailed manner. However, the creation of this documentation is a time-consuming and error-prone process. Especially in game genres that require rapid prototyping, incomplete or insufficient GDDs can cause delays in the project process. This study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of LLMs in GDD production. The hyper-casual game Pool Wars was selected as a reference, and for this example game, the GDD created by a human expert and the GDD produced by ChatGPT-4 using various prompt methods were evaluated by four experts in the field according to eight different criteria using a five-point Likert scale. In addition to structural and creative aspects, visual elements were also included in the evaluation process. ImageFX, developed by Google, was used to add visual content to the GDD created by ChatGPT-4. As a result, it was seen that LLMs were more successful in many criteria in GDD production. As a result of the scoring made by an academician and three experts from the sector, GDD created by LLM received an overall average score of 4.71 out of 5, while GDD prepared by human expert received 3.29 points. GDD produced by LLM showed a clear superiority especially in terms of understandability and level of detail. However, it showed a similar performance to human expert in terms of creativity and visual content and it was observed that there was room for improvement in these areas.
    URI
    http://dspace.beu.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/16386
    Collections
    • Cilt 14, Sayı 3 (2025) [12]





    Creative Commons License
    DSpace@BEU by Bitlis Eren University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     




    | Yönerge | Rehber | İletişim |

    sherpa/romeo

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV